The Fourth Industrial Revolution has been instrumental in reshaping our lives. With blockchain, cryptocurrencies, DeFi, and decentralized technologies, there is no doubt that we are witnessing a tectonic shift in virtually all commercial categories. Regarding the intersection of finance, real estate, art, and ownership, NFTs (non-fungible tokens) have experienced a sudden and substantial rise in popularity, with the multitude of potential use cases driving billions of dollars of investment into the ecosystem.
While there is great potential, NFTs implicate various legal considerations and ramifications, including securities laws, contracts, and intellectual property rights, among numerous other regulatory frameworks. Novel questions are raised, such as how centuries-old intellectual property laws apply to 21st-century technology. Courts have begun to settle these questions, and we are seeing new laws being enacted on trademark, securities, and other legal fronts.
We also see civil settlements of varying kinds and motivations, such as the securities class action involving the NBA Top Shot matter from Dapper Labs, the company behind CryptoKitties. In a sign that these open questions persist, in August 2024, the largest NFT marketplace platform, OpenSea, received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a notice from the SEC indicating impending enforcement action. Individual NFT projects, such as CyberKongz, have also received the dreaded Wells Notice, which is notable given it comes in the waning days of Chair Gensler’s tenure at the helm of the SEC. Some companies, such as DraftKings, have closed their NFT marketplaces following litigation, highlighting the immense compliance obligations that certain types of NFTs entail.
For specific NFT projects, there is the potential for criminal liability. For example, the space has become notorious for “rug pulls” and related scams, as well as threats and intimidation as a result of flared tensions and disputes. These instances are illustrated by the recent announcement from the Department of Justice, which announced the prosecution of the “Largest NFT Scheme Prosecuted to Date.”
When it comes to marketing a particular NFT project or concept, influencers or celebrity endorsements in the context of NFTs and cryptocurrency, more broadly, are an area for private actions against such promoters, as illustrated by the NFT lawsuit against Shaquille O’Neal.
A Burgeoning Area With Wide-Ranging Legal Considerations
At RICHT, our NFT law practice is part of LexoCrypto™, our dedicated and multidisciplinary service offering that focuses on the intersection of cryptocurrency and blockchain with the law. We aim to provide clients with NFT legal advice, offering much-needed clarity and capitalizing on opportunities within the complex and risk-filled NFT landscape.
NFT Law Services We Offer
NFT Marketplace KYC & AML
Our Related Blockchain Practices
… an investment contract for purposes of the Securities Act means a contract, transaction or scheme whereby [1] a person invests his money in a [2] common enterprise and is [3] led to expect profits [4] solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party… Such a definition…permits the fulfillment of the statutory purpose of compelling full and fair disclosure relative to the issuance of the many types of instruments that in our commercial world fall within the ordinary concept of a security…. It embodies a flexible rather than a static principle, one that is capable of adaptation to meet the countless and variable schemes devised by those who seek the use of the money of others on the promise of profits.
SEC v. W. J. Howey Co.
