Artificial intelligence (AI) is a technology with immense potential to change our world and every area of our daily lives. From employee use for business automation and consumer-focused generative AI tools to self-driving cars and even AI lawyering, AI is poised to be one of the most innovative technologies of our lives. The technology is so powerful that countries are vying to be leaders in AI, and industry CEOs are calling for security measures and strategic plans to foster its safe development.

The significant potential of AI inevitably attracts global regulatory scrutiny, leading to the development of comprehensive legal frameworks that companies must navigate.

Global Regulatory Scrutiny and Frameworks
This evolving landscape ranges from the European Union’s recently passed AI Act to emerging laws in the United States. Within the U.S., states like Utah have enacted AI legislationColorado has introduced its own, and a “flurry” of AI laws is emerging from California. At the federal level, the Senate has established an “AI working group”. International collaboration is also key, with countries such as the United States and the United Kingdom partnering to better understand and guard against emerging AI risks.

Core Legal and Ethical Challenges
Beyond legislative efforts, AI presents various ethical questions and liability ramifications. There are also uncertainties about how existing intellectual property law applies to this new paradigm and how AI should be integrated into privacy law frameworks, such as the European Union’s GDPR and state laws like the CCPA.

As a nascent and rapidly evolving technology, AI’s swiftly developing capabilities bring forth novel legal questions. This is particularly true on the privacy front, with significant issues arising concerning AI and location data. Differing approaches to data processing in the AI context among various AI vendors and the associated data processing agreement requirements and restrictions on AI vendors’ training on data also demand careful consideration. Furthermore, there is heightened focus on “higher risk” or “sensitive” uses of artificial intelligence, such as potential bias in recruitingemployment monitoring, and healthcare applications.

Operational Complexities and Contractual Safeguards
Opaque terms and conditions or privacy policies that inadequately address how AI features interact with existing online terms are increasingly common pain points. This was illustrated by the public backlash Adobe received concerning its vague terms. Even for services not directly offering AI, legal considerations related to AI, such as in the M&A context, must be taken into account. These represent just a few of the myriad legal ramifications of AI, which will undoubtedly continue to evolve and expand. However, certain essential AI legal considerations should be addressed as a foundational matter.

Proactive Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement

Regulators and lawmakers are increasingly focusing on implementing legal frameworks for AI. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is particularly active in regulating and enforcing AI, especially concerning “deceptive or unfair conduct” under Section 5 of the FTC Act, and through the general AI guidance it issues.

Furthermore, private legal actions, including class actions and other multi-district litigation (MDL), are becoming more prevalent in the artificial intelligence space, with many leading voices anticipating an imminent surge of AI-related litigation. Currently, it is crucial for AI tools and operations to undergo thorough AI governance and assessments to identify risks and associated compliance obligations, followed by the implementation of corresponding mitigation strategies.

At RICHT, we are AI lawyers focused on partnering with clients to navigate the artificial intelligence space, stay ahead of the regulatory curve, and understand AI policy more broadly. We assist with a range of AI-related legal matters, including:

  • Addressing privacy compliance and intellectual property considerations, particularly copyright law, for the development and use of large language models (LLMs).
  • Drafting and negotiating vendor agreements with major LLM providers, such as Amazon’s AWS Bedrock AI offering or Microsoft’s Azure AI. This includes crucial aspects like limiting training on client data (a common point of contention) and ensuring adequate indemnification, among other legal considerations.

Our goal is to empower clients to leverage AI for continued innovation while effectively managing legal risk.


Contact An AI Lawyer To Learn How We Can




    Artificial Intelligence Law Services We Offer


    Privacy Compliance

    Employment Law

    Regulatory Compliance

    AI Ethics & Public Affairs

    AI Policy Creation

    Cybersecurity


    Sectors We Serve


    Technology

    Financial Services

    Healthcare & Life Sciences

    Shipping & Logistics

    MarTech

    Industrials


    Of Enterprises Will Have Incorporated AI By 2026 (Gartner)


    AI & The Law Legal Resource Hub

    Compiling developments and resources concerning the intersection of artificial intelligence and the law.


     

    EUROPEAN UNION’S AI ACT CHART

    AI Law FAQs

    Since artificial intelligence is evolving rapidly and bringing so many novel applications, we regularly have to confront legal questions as AI encounters legal frameworks that may be decades or even centuries old and certainly did not envision AI when the laws were formulated. For example, copyright law has existed in some form in common or statutory law for centuries. The courts are currently challenged about how historical laws protecting intellectual property (IP) should treat AI, whether concerning training models or their outputs. Other significant legal ramifications for AI center around privacy and data protection, including as they relate to who owns data and how privacy rights can be exercised in the ecosystem of artificial intelligence. Further, sectors with particularly valuable applications for AI tools, such as healthcare and human resources and recruiting, are getting additional scrutiny from regulators to ensure that utility is not the only factor considered and that the rights of individuals are protected. Relevant regulators such as the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), and the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) are increasingly putting out rules and guidance for how AI can and cannot be used. Jurisdictions ranging from individual states in the United States and Congress on the federal level are deliberating and, in some cases, passing AI-specific legislation. Internationally, there is plenty of regulatory activity pertaining to AI, including but not limited to the European Union (EU) recently passing the AI Act.
    Read more

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) Law News


    • Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance: Eight Action Items for Life Sciences Companies: The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences Working Group XIV (CIOMS) Draft Report offers comprehensive principles and best practices, translating global artificial intelligence (AI) requirements — such as those in the EU Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) — into practical guidance for pharmacovigilance (PV). Read More →

    • AI law 101: What do AI lawyers do? Ever since OpenAI launched ChatGPT two years ago, the global economy has been awash with alternating waves of excitement and apprehension about the new technology. Recognizing the plethora of legal issues that artificial intelligence raises, companies scrambled for policies to govern AI adoption in organizations as well as contracts and procedures for integrating AI features up and down the tech supply chain. Read More →
    • AI Governance Profession Report 2025: This report, and the data within it, profiles the extent to which organizations are implementing AI governance programs, and how they are doing so. Indeed, survey data shows how the development and deployment of AI by organizations very often goes hand in hand with AI governance. Read More →
    POLITICO

    Elon Musk’s X Under Fire Over Harvesting Users’ Data To Train AI Chatbot

    X is facing scrutiny from its main European privacy regulator over collecting people’s posts to train its artificial intelligence chatbot, a move that may infringe upon data protection rules.

    AI Law
    Privacy Law
    THE FINANCIAL TIMES

    Cloud Giants Offer Only Limited Protection to Businesses Over AI Copyright Claims

    The world’s biggest cloud computing companies that have pushed new artificial intelligence tools to their business customers are offering only limited protections against potential copyright lawsuits over the technology.

    AI Law
    Copyright Law
    IAPP

    EU Reaches Deal On World's First Comprehensive AI Regulation

    After three days of intense negotiations, the European Union reached a political agreement 8 Dec. on the Artificial Intelligence Act, which would be the world’s first comprehensive regulation of AI.

    AI Law
    IAPP

    AI vs. privacy: How to reconcile the need for sensitive data with the principle of minimization

    In the interest of good privacy practices, companies limit or avoid the collection of sensitive data, such as race or ethnicity, but then realize that without it, they are less able to engage in adequate artificial intelligence bias testing.

    AI Law
    Wall Street Journal

    White House Issues ‘Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights’

    The White House on Tuesday issued guidelines aimed at safeguarding personal data from misuse in artificial-intelligence algorithms that drive hiring, lending and other business decisions.

    AI Law
    Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance

    Generative Artificial Intelligence and Corporate Boards: Cautions and Considerations

    Generative AI (i.e., AI creating original content using machine learning and neural networks) has captivated people everywhere, producing a range of responses from doomsday warnings of machines rendering humans extinct to rosy dreams where machines possess magical properties. In corporate boardrooms, however, a more sober conversation is occurring.

    AI Law
    National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

    NIST Risk Management Framework Aims to Improve Trustworthiness of Artificial Intelligence

    New guidance seeks to cultivate trust in AI technologies and promote AI innovation while mitigating risk.

    AI Law
    WSJ

    ChatGPT Ban Lifted in Italy After Data-Privacy Concessions

    Developer OpenAI made the changes after Italy’s privacy regulator temporarily barred the AI tool.

    AI Law
    The Center for Data Innovation

    Critics of Generative AI Are Worrying About the Wrong IP Issues

    Critics argue developers of generative AI systems such as ChatGPT and DALL-E have unfairly trained their models on copyrighted works.

    AI Law
    IAPP

    Privacy & Responsible AI

    Artificial intelligence and machine learning are advancing at an unprecedented speed. This raises the question: How can AI/ML systems be used in a responsible and ethical way that deserves the trust of users and society?

    AI Law

    Our Insights