Terms That Provide Protection For Websites & Apps
In An Area Of Increasing Risk
Terms and conditions (“T&Cs”), which are also sometimes referred to as terms of service, are legal agreements that, in addition to others, such as a privacy policy, act as an online contract between the owner of a website or other web-based application and those who utilize it. Whether you operate an eCommerce website or some other business with an online presence, terms and conditions are necessary to adequately protect your business and bring with them a variety of legal considerations.
Terms and Conditions Come In “All Shapes and Sizes”
Depending on the type of business and website or app, online terms could include a range of clauses, such as those that protect intellectual property, provisions to limit liability, and acceptable use and associated banning of users, among a whole host of other potential clauses.
There are numerous more nuanced considerations besides just which clauses to include, such as which arbitration provider to utilize if there is an arbitration provision in the terms and conditions (as a side note, arbitration clauses are increasingly proliferating, though there are nuanced considerations about whether to include one). Further, and in particular, in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) and associated legal considerations, ensuring that terms of service are inclusive of any AI-related processes and features is critical. This additional area of focus in the AI context was illustrated by the backlash against Adobe and their terms lacking clarity about how they apply in the age of AI. There are more niche aspects of terms and conditions that require attention, such as not barring consumer reviews to comply with certain state laws, and the cottage industry has popped up trying to “pigeonhole” private actions via opaquely worded terms. There is also the related scourge of ADA website compliance lawsuits as well as CIPA-type claims that can be at least partially accounted for and mitigated to some degree via protective terms and conditions.
Some additional examples of terms and conditions and their “real world” effects include the following:
- The FTC has issued guidance concerning unilaterally changing online terms and stated, “It may be unfair or deceptive for a company to adopt more permissive data practices—for example, to start sharing consumers’ data with third parties or using that data for AI training—and to only inform consumers of this change through a surreptitious, retroactive amendment to its terms of service or privacy policy.
- After the genetic testing company 23andMe was hacked, it amended its online terms and conditions, among other changes, to prevent users from using via class actions in an apparent attempt to shield the company from debilitating mass litigation. TikTok made a similar change to their terms with the goal of avoiding similar types of class actions.
- A New Jersey couple severely injured during an Uber ride must take their complaint to arbitration per the company’s use terms, a state appeals court ruled after they had agreed to Uber’s “terms of use.”
- The Second Circuit handed down a ruling in United States v. Maher rejecting the claim that terms of service waive Fourth Amendment rights, at least in the important context of a Google account.
- A recent case involving HBO illustrated the challenge of updating terms on a website to ensure any amendments are binding to both previous and current users.
In addition to considerations about the contents of the terms and conditions, the specific architecture of how users can view and bind themselves to the terms plays a critical role in whether courts will find that there is an enforceable contract. Specifically, the user interface of where and how a user agrees to a website or app terms requires strategic placement of any buttons or links, such as in “clickwrap” (affirmative agreement to terms via a “check the box”) versus “browsewrap” (where the terms and any other agreements are in the footer but no affirmative consent). (The “wrap” terminology comes from the “shrinkwrap” notices that were included with physical items.) As the court in Olberstein v. Live Nation stated: “To ensure that an online agreement passes muster, clickwrap is the safest choice.”
It is also important to ensure that varying online terms, such as those relating to promotions like sweepstakes, align with the general terms, as was illustrated in the Coinbase sweepstakes case that went before the Supreme Court. These considerations help illustrate that while terms and conditions might seem mundane and meaningless, legalese not requiring much attention, the opposite is true; terms and conditions play a pivotal role in protecting you and your business.
Comparing Online Generated Terms and Conditions Vs. Drafted By A Lawyer
In contrast to terms that an automated tool might generate, terms and conditions drafted by a lawyer are specific to your business and ensure that relevant and essential protections are in place. But, perhaps, even more importantly, a lawyer helps ensure that any disadvantageous terms are not included. A set of terms created online by a generator may contain such unwanted clauses, leading a business to unknowingly and unnecessarily increase its risk and not benefit from valuable protections. Astute drafting by a lawyer concerning where to include advantageous clauses and when to exclude those terms that might be disadvantageous is critical, as courts generally hold that terms and conditions correctly agreed to online are legally enforceable agreements, resulting in the potential for harmful clauses to be used against your business. In addition, there are several ways that terms and conditions and a Privacy Policy interact, and it is important that there is an understanding of the clauses in each agreement that correspond with each other.
At RICHT, we provide clients with an affordable way to protect their business with comprehensive terms and conditions specific to the nuances of their particular operations. We evaluate your business to understand how you can best account for and mitigate risk and then draft suitable terms and conditions.
Get Peace Of Mind Knowing You Are Protected With Robust Terms and Conditions Drafted By A Lawyer For Your Website Or App
Quietly Changing Your Terms of Service Could Be Unfair or Deceptive
It may be unfair or deceptive for a company to adopt more permissive data practices—for example, to start sharing consumers’ data with third parties or using that data for AI training—and to only inform consumers of this change through a surreptitious, retroactive amendment to its terms of service or privacy policy.
More Chaos in the Law of Online Contract Formation
An overview of “the jurisprudential chaos” in online terms and conditions contract formation law. The two top-line takeaways are that a two-click formation process avoids risk concerning contract formation and hence enforceability, and, if amending online terms and conditions, maintaining an evidentiary record is essential.
TikTok Quietly Changes User Terms Amid Growing Legal Scrutiny
Parents, schools and even attorneys general have increasingly been raising concerns about how TikTok may be hooking children to the app and serving them inappropriate content. But some lawyers say bringing legal action against the company could be more difficult after TikTok quietly changed its U.S. terms of service this summer.
23andMe Frantically Changed Its Terms of Service to Prevent Hacked Customers From Suing
Genetic testing company 23andMe changed its terms of service to prevent customers from filing class action lawsuits or participating in a jury trial days after reports revealing that attackers accessed personal information of nearly 7 million people — half of the company’s user base — in an October hack.
Amazon Screws Up Its TOS Amendments (Again)
Is new affirmative consumer assent needed for each amendment to a Terms of Service (TOS), or can some vaguer “notice” to consumers sometimes substitute?
Court Says “You May NOT Amend Your TOS by Posting New Terms to Your Site”
Courts have begun to require more rigorous evidence of notice and assent to enforce modifications to online agreements.
Poorly Executed “Sign-in-Wrap” Contract Formation Process Fails
The Ninth Circuit recently considered when consumers assent to terms through interacting with a website. The court confirms that to ensure enforceability, consumers should (1) check the box and (2) be advised that checking the box will indicate assent to contract terms.
2022 "Clickwrap" Litigation Trends Report
Understanding how the courts assess online agreements is a crucial way to protect your business from risk.
Amending Your TOS? Better Use a Clickthrough Process, Not Email Notice
Mandatory clickthroughs for amendments are the new best practice, and email notices–even if worded optimally–are not best practice.
